Establishing Employment Status for an Anglican Priest in Queensland: A Legal Analysis for an Unfair Dismissal Claim – Part 3

Following the analysis of the ‘spiritual office’ defence and objective evidence in the previous parts, this section synthesizes the argument by focusing on the most potent evidence: the Diocese’s own internal governance documents. These documents—including canons and ordinances—function as employer-like policies and procedures, establishing a clear hierarchy of control and discipline. We conclude with a consolidated legal strategy and a practical checklist of evidence needed to prosecute an unfair dismissal claim successfully.

Section 6: The Diocese’s Own Rules as Evidence of Control

The most potent evidence of the high degree of control—a primary indicator of employment—can be found within the Anglican Church’s own internal governance documents. While framed in ecclesiastical language, these canons, ordinances, and protocols, when analysed through the lens of employment law, function as a comprehensive set of workplace policies, procedures, and disciplinary mechanisms. They establish a clear, hierarchical power structure where the priest is subordinate to the authority of the Bishop and the Diocese.

6.1. Governance and Discipline in the Anglican Church

The overarching legal framework for the church is established in the Constitution of the Anglican Church of Australia.¹⁵ This document confirms that the church will “follow and uphold His discipline” and grants the General Synod power to make canons for the “order and good government of this Church,” including matters of discipline.³⁹ It establishes a national system of tribunals, including Diocesan Tribunals with jurisdiction to hear charges against clergy for breaches of faith, discipline, and other specified offences.¹⁵ This constitutional framework delegates the implementation of this disciplinary authority to the individual dioceses, which enact their own specific ordinances. These documents are not a “consensual compact” in the sense of a negotiated agreement; they are a top-down regulatory regime to which a priest must submit as a condition of their license and position.

6.2. Employer-like Functions: Dissecting Diocesan Ordinances

A detailed examination of specific Diocesan documents reveals functions that are directly analogous to those of a secular employer managing its workforce.

The ‘Clergy Complaints and Performance Protocol’ (Anglican Church Southern Queensland): This document is exceptionally valuable as evidence of control.¹² It is, in substance, a corporate performance management and disciplinary policy. Key features that demonstrate employer-like control include:

• Hierarchical Authority: The protocol establishes that the Regional Bishop is responsible for managing complaints and performance issues, but the Archbishop holds the ultimate authority for any final disciplinary action, including the critical decision to revoke a priest’s license.¹²
• Performance Management: The protocol outlines a formal process for the Regional Bishop to identify performance issues, meet with the clergy member, and establish “individual plans,” “training,” or a formal “Performance Improvement Plan”.¹² This is indistinguishable from standard corporate HR practice.
• Formal Disciplinary Process: For serious matters, the protocol details a formal disciplinary response, including a “Notice of Meeting” outlining allegations, an opportunity for the priest to respond, and a series of potential outcomes ranging from a formal warning to a recommendation for dismissal (license revocation).¹²

The ‘Clergy Discipline Ordinance’: Documents such as the Grafton Diocese’s ‘Clergy Discipline Ordinance 1966’ provide a further layer of evidence.¹³ These ordinances function as a detailed workplace code of conduct, complete with a judicial process for enforcement. They contain:

• A comprehensive list of “offences”: This goes beyond purely spiritual matters to include workplace-style issues like “habitual or wilful neglect of ministerial duty after written admonition” and “wilful failure to pay just debts”.¹³
• A formal tribunal process: The ordinance sets out detailed procedures for making charges, convening a tribunal, conducting a trial (including rules of evidence), and delivering a sentence.¹³
• The power to suspend: Crucially, the ordinance grants the Bishop the power to suspend a clergy member from their duties pending the outcome of a charge, provided their income is maintained.¹³ This power of suspension is a classic right of an employer.

Canons Governing Entitlements: The existence of specific canons and policies governing entitlements, such as the “Ministry Unit Clergy Annual Leave Canon” found in the North Queensland Diocese ³¹ and detailed Diocesan guides on stipends and allowances ³⁸, further demonstrates organisational control. These entitlements are not granted arbitrarily; they are regulated and administered by the Diocese in a manner akin to an enterprise agreement or a set of company policies, standardising conditions across the workforce.

In totality, these internal documents prove that the Diocese does not merely provide spiritual guidance. It actively manages, directs, disciplines, and controls its clergy in a manner that is substantively identical to that of an employer. These documents are a blueprint of the “practical reality” of the relationship, and they overwhelmingly support the conclusion that a priest is an employee.

Section 7: Synthesis and Strategic Recommendations

7.1. A Consolidated Argument: The “Practical Reality” of Employment

The determination of an Anglican priest’s employment status for the purpose of an unfair dismissal claim must now be conducted through the legislative lens of the Closing Loopholes amendments. This requires the Fair Work Commission to assess the “real substance, practical reality and true nature of the relationship” by examining the totality of the circumstances.⁴ When this test is applied, the cumulative weight of the evidence overwhelmingly establishes that the relationship between the priest and the Anglican Diocese of Southern Queensland is one of employment.

The argument is a multi-faceted one. First, the application of the reinstated multi-factorial test demonstrates that the key indicia of employment are present. The Diocese exercises a high degree of practical, administrative, and disciplinary control, evidenced most powerfully by its own internal ordinances and protocols. The priest is fully integrated into the Diocese’s structure and mission, performing its core functions. The financial relationship is characterised by regular remuneration from which PAYG tax is withheld and for which superannuation contributions are made—the hallmarks of a salary. The priest is required to provide personal service and cannot delegate their core duties, and the Diocese bears the overwhelming financial and operational risk of the enterprise.

Second, the historical defence that a priest holds a purely “spiritual office” is no longer tenable following the High Court’s decision in Ermogenous. The abolition of the presumption against legal relations means the Diocese cannot simply rely on labels; it must engage with the objective facts, which point to a legally binding, remunerative relationship.

Third, the Diocese’s own conduct in complying with Commonwealth tax and superannuation laws constitutes a practical admission of an employment-like relationship. It cannot credibly assert a different status to the FWC solely to avoid its obligations under the Fair Work Act 2009. Finally, a critical strategic advantage exists in identifying the correct legal entity of the employer—”The Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane”—which neutralises a key argument that has caused previous clergy claims to fail.

7.2. Refuting the Diocese’s Position: A Final Rebuttal

The priest’s case should be prepared to proactively dismantle the anticipated arguments of the Diocese:

• Anticipated Argument: “The priest holds a spiritual office, not a job. The relationship is a covenantal one, not contractual.”
  • Rebuttal: The High Court in Ermogenous abolished the legal presumption that underpins this argument. The FWC must now look at the objective facts. The facts of Diocesan control, regular payment, tax withholding, and superannuation contributions establish a legally recognisable relationship that has the substance of employment, regardless of the ecclesiastical labels used.²²
• Anticipated Argument: “There was no intention to create legal relations between the parties.”
  • Rebuttal: Intention is assessed objectively. The Diocese’s own conduct in complying with complex statutory regimes like the PAYG tax system and the Superannuation Guarantee—both of which are predicated on an employer/employee relationship—is powerful objective evidence of its intention to create and maintain a legally regulated working arrangement.¹⁷
• Anticipated Argument: “The ‘Letter of Call’ or the priest’s license is not an employment contract and may even contain a disclaimer.”
  • Rebuttal: Under the new “practical reality” test in the Fair Work Act, the terms of the contract are no longer solely determinative. A label or disclaimer cannot override the substantive reality of the entire relationship. The FWC is statutorily required to look at how the relationship operated in practice, where the priest was directed, remunerated, and managed like an employee.³
• Anticipated Argument: “The payment is a ‘stipend’ to support a ministry, not a salary for work.”
  • Rebuttal: The label is irrelevant; the function is what matters. It is a regular, fixed payment in return for the priest’s labour and service. The fact that it is treated as assessable income from which tax is withheld demonstrates that, for all practical and legal purposes, it functions as a salary.¹⁶
• Anticipated Argument (based on Fihaki): “The Church is an unincorporated association and cannot be an employer.”
  • Rebuttal: This is factually incorrect for the Anglican Diocese of Southern Queensland. The paying and controlling entity is “The Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane,” a body corporate established by statute and fully capable of being an employer.³² This distinguishes the case from precedents involving genuinely unincorporated bodies.

7.3. Evidentiary Checklist for the Applicant

To effectively prosecute the unfair dismissal claim, the applicant priest should gather and prepare the following documentary evidence to substantiate the arguments outlined in this report. This evidence will be crucial for demonstrating the “practical reality” of the employment relationship to the Fair Work Commission.

Document Checklist:

• Appointment and Role Documents:
  • The “Letter of Call,” license, or any other document formalising the appointment to the parish.
  • Any duty statement, role description, or similar document, whether formal or informal, that outlines expected tasks and responsibilities.
• Financial Records:
  • A complete set of payslips or remuneration statements received from the Diocese, showing the regularity of payments, the amounts, any listed hourly rate, and crucially, the deductions for PAYG tax.
  • All annual Payment Summaries or Income Statements issued by the Diocese for taxation purposes.
  • A complete set of superannuation fund statements showing the history of employer contributions made by the Diocese, including the name of the contributing entity.
• Diocesan Governance Documents:
  • A copy of the Constitution of the Anglican Church of Australia.
  • Copies of all relevant Canons and Ordinances for the Anglican Church Southern Queensland, specifically including:
    • The ‘Clergy Complaints and Performance Protocol’.
    • The ‘Clergy Discipline Ordinance’.
    • Any canons relating to leave entitlements (annual, sick, long service).
    • Any canons or policies relating to stipends and allowances.
• Evidence of Control and Direction:
  • Any written correspondence (emails, letters, memoranda) from the Bishop, Archdeacon, or other Diocesan officials containing instructions, directions, or performance feedback.
  • Records of formal or informal performance reviews.
  • Any documentation related to the disciplinary process that led to the dismissal.
• Evidence of Leave:
  • Copies of any applications made for annual leave, sick leave, or long service leave, and any correspondence approving such leave.
• Corporate Entity Identification:
  • Any document (such as a payslip or superannuation statement) that clearly identifies the ABN and full legal name of the paying entity, which should be “The Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane.”

Works cited

1. [2023] FWC 1650 – DECISION, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2023fwc1650.pdf
2. New employee definition under the Fair Work Act – Employment Plus, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://www.employmentplus.com.au/news/new-employee-definition-under-the-fair-work-act
3. New definitions of ’employee’ and ’employment’ to have significant effects on contractor relationships | Gilchrist Connell, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://www.gclegal.com.au/insights/new-definitions-of-employee-and-employment-to-have-significant-effects-on-contractor
4. Meaning of ’employee’ and ’employer’ in the Fair Work Act 2009, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://www.dewr.gov.au/download/15645/meaning-employee-and-employer-fair-work-act-2009/36529/meaning-employee-and-employer-fair-work-act-2009/pdf
5. Whole of relationship test – Fair Work Ombudsman, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://www.fairwork.gov.au/find-help-for/independent-contractors/whole-of-relationship-test
6. Employee and Contractor Classification – Go To Court, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://www.gotocourt.com.au/employee-and-contractor-classification/
7. Employee or independent contractor – High Court clarifies the test | Lindsay Taylor Lawyers, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://www.lindsaytaylorlawyers.com.au/in_focus/employee-or-independent-contractor-high-court-clarifies-the-test/
8. Binding without ink: Applicability of the ’employee vs contractor’ test to unwritten agreements, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://www.holdingredlich.com/binding-without-ink-applicability-of-the-employee-vs-contractor-test-to-unwritten-agreements
9. Defining an Employee in Australia: Multiple Definitions – Macpherson Kelley, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://mk.com.au/defining-an-employee-in-australia/
10. Fair Work Ombudsman Operations Manual Supplementary Information Relating to Sham Contracting, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://www.aph.gov.au/~/media/Estimates/Live/eet_ctte/estimates/add_1314/answers/employment/EM0146_14_AttachmentA.pdf
11. DECIDING BETWEEN AN EMPLOYEE OR CONTRACTOR? – CPA Australia, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://www.cpaaustralia.com.au/-/media/project/cpa/corporate/documents/achivies/deciding-between-an-employee-or-contractor.pdf
12. Anglican Church Southern Queensland Clergy Complaints and …, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://www.cornerstone-church.com.au/wp-content/uploads/ClergyComplaintsandPerformanceProtocolJune2021.pdf
13. CLERGY DISCIPLINE ORDINANCE 1966 – Anglican Diocese of …, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://www.graftondiocese.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Clergy-Discipline-Ordinance-1966-as-amended-2017.pdf
14. Standards for Clergy and Church Workers – Newcastle Anglican, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://www.newcastleanglican.org.au/standards-for-clergy-and-church-workers-and-safe-ministry-screening/
15. THE CONSTITUTION, CANONS AND RULES OF THE ANGLICAN …, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://anglican.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Green-Book-Master-as-at-040624.pdf
16. Church minister claims unfair dismissal, but is he an employee? – A Whole New Approach, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://awna.com.au/church-minister-claims-unfair-dismissal-but-is-he-an-employee/
17. CLERGY REMUNERATION GUIDEBOOK – Anglican Diocese of Bendigo, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://www.bendigoanglican.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Clergy-Remuneration-Guidebook-2023.pdf
18. Remuneration Minimum Standards 2024 Contents – Anglican Diocese of the Northern Territory, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://ntanglican.squarespace.com/s/SP001-Remuneration-Minimum-Standards-2024-Final-with-annex-for-web.pdf
19. Fair Work Commission tells minister Hedley Fihaki – you are not an employee, but Uniting Church could have sacked you even if you were – THE OTHER CHEEK, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://theothercheek.com.au/fair-work-commission-tells-minister-hedley-fihaki-you-are-not-an-employee-but-uniting-church-could-have-sacked-you-even-if-you-were/
20. This article explores the private law and employment status of faith workers. Although faith workers generally lack statutory em – ‘classic’ AustLII, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://www4.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/MqLawJl/2009/6.pdf
21. bargain or benefice? understanding the legal … – QUT ePrints, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://eprints.qut.edu.au/122618/1/Christopher_Mills_Thesis.pdf
22. Employment status of clergy – Law and Religion Australia, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://lawandreligionaustralia.blog/2015/05/03/employment-status-of-clergy/
23. Unfair dismissal; churches and ministers – Fair Work Legal Advice, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://fairworklegaladvice.com.au/unfair-dismissal-churches-and-ministers/
24. Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc – [2002] HCA 8 – 209 CLR 95; 76 ALJR 465; 187 ALR 92 – BarNet Jade, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://jade.io/summary/mnc/2002/HCA/8
25. Ermogenous – Australian Contract Law, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://www.australiancontractlaw.info/cases/database/ermogenous-v-greek-orthodox-community
26. Ermogenous – Law and Religion Australia, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://lawandreligionaustralia.blog/tag/ermogenous/
27. PART VI – INTENTION – Jaani.net, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://jaani.net/resources/law_notes/contracts/06_Intention.pdf
28. Clergy employment status – Law and Religion Australia, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://lawandreligionaustralia.blog/category/clergy-employment-status/
29. Assistant Pastor of church an “employee” for unfair dismissal claim, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://lawandreligionaustralia.blog/2020/10/05/assistant-pastor-of-church-an-employee-for-unfair-dismissal-claim/
30. Needed, a court case for minister’s employment rights – THE OTHER CHEEK, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://theothercheek.com.au/needed-a-court-case-for-ministers-employment-rights/
31. Diocesan Constitution and Canons – Anglican Diocese of North Queensland, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://www.anglicannq.org/governance/diocesan-constitution-and-canons
32. ACSQ Governance – Anglican Schools Commission, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://www.ascqld.org/governance/governance/
33. Anglican Church of Australia (Diocese of Brisbane) Property Act 1889 – Queensland Legislation, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/whole/html/inforce/2021-06-23/act-1889-acadbpa
34. Anglican Church of Australia Constitution Act 1961 No 16 – NSW Legislation, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://legislation.nsw.gov.au/view/whole/html/inforce/current/act-1961-016
35. TR 92/17 – Australian Taxation Office, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://www.ato.gov.au/law/view/pdf/pbr/tr1992-017.pdf
36. Religious practitioners | Australian Taxation Office, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://www.ato.gov.au/businesses-and-organisations/hiring-and-paying-your-workers/payg-withholding/payments-you-need-to-withhold-from/payments-with-special-rules/religious-practitioners
37. Payments with special rules | Australian Taxation Office, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://www.ato.gov.au/businesses-and-organisations/hiring-and-paying-your-workers/payg-withholding/payments-you-need-to-withhold-from/payments-with-special-rules
38. Memo to Clergy and Parishes 2024 stipends allowances, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://adelaideanglicans.lbcdn.io/uploads/2023/12/Memo-to-Clergy-and-Parishes-2024-stipends-allowances.pdf
39. Part 1 the constitution of the anglican church of australia 1 part i chapter i. -fundamental declarations, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://anglican.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/The-Constitution-of-the-Anglican-Church-of-Australia-170124.pdf
40. SYNOD Report & Accounts 2022 | Adelaide Anglicans, accessed on September 6, 2025, https://adelaideanglicans.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Synod-Report-Accounts-2022.pdf